 |
 |
RESOURCES
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
VISIT OUR SPONSORS
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Home
Theater Audio Systems
July 2002
All text and graphics copyright © 2002 Flying Cloud Press, Inc.
|
|
In the early
days of the movies there was just the visual image to enjoy. Motion
picture technology had not yet advanced to the point where synchronized
sound tracks were possible. This detail, however, did little to dampen
the enthusiasm for films produced during this "silent era",
movies were big stuff, but it is interesting to note that in an attempt
to compensate for this sound deficiency many studios released features
with sheet music scores so that piano players could play along with the
film. As we know now, sound is a critically important part of the motion
picture experience, but in the early days, this was just becoming known.
The Silent Era lasted until the late 1920s. By this time,
several studios had developed synchronized motion picture sound tracks
systems and began showing them theaters. By today’s standards, these
early "talkies" films were pretty crude, but the concept of
sound to accompany the on-screen picture was rapidly embraced by the
viewing public.
Just
a decade later, in a continuing quest for technical achievement, the
Hollywood studios began to experiment with multi-channel cinema sound.
Interestingly, one of the first multichannel films was Walt Disney’s
well known Fantasia, which was released in 1941 in "Fantasound."
This 6 discrete channel (!), high-fidelity release caused quite a stir
and soon Hollywood became awash in a sea of incompatible, multichannel
formats issued by many of the major studios.
Standardization on a common multichannel format did not
occur until the 1960s when Ray Dolby, a young engineer with Ampex
corporation, developed a process for recording multichannel sound
optically onto movie film. This was considered a major advance in the
motion picture industry because the "Dolby-encoded" optical
sound tracks could be played in both the old mono/stereo movie theaters,
and in the new "Dolby Stereo" four channel surround theaters.
Almost overnight it became the standard for cinema sound.
Although Dolby Stereo, and it’s home version, Dolby
Surround, were the best and only systems for a long time, the advent of
digital technology in the 1980s advanced sound technology even further.
Today most major movies for theatrical viewing are released in one or
more of the following digital formats: Dolby Digital, DTS, or SDDS,
(More on these later).
How The Original Dolby Stereo System Works
In the original commercial, analog Dolby Stereo cinema
sound systems, the left and right audio tracks are read optically off
the film strip and fed to a Dolby Stereo Cinema Processor (see the
diagram below.) This processor decodes the Dolby Stereo signal into four
different channels, in particular:
The Center Channel. Here
the filmmakers place most of the on-screen dialogue spoken by the
actors.
The Left and Right Front Channels. These channels carry
more traditional stereo sounds, such as music and sound effects, but
they are also used for dialogue and effects when actors move off to
either side of the screen. (Example: When you see a shot of a train
coming onto the screen on the right and going across to the left, the
director will do the same to the train sound. It will progress from
right speaker to the center speaker and then on to the left speaker.)
The Surround Channel. First, it is important to note that there is only one surround channel. In many
theaters there is an array of speakers at the rear but with the Dolby
Stereo system, only one channel from the Dolby Stereo decoder drives
them. The surround channel is for two things. The first and foremost is
for ambience. In other words, in order to give a feeling of "being
there", directors often mix the sounds that lead to spaciousness,
like the sound of rain, for example, into the surround tracks. Another
thing surround channels are often used for is for directional sound
effects. (Example: as helicopters roar overhead, directors often mix the
sound tracks so that the choppers pass from the front speakers to the
rear speakers in a thundering roar.
Since it’s release in
the late 1960s, over 6000 movies have been recorded with Dolby
Stereo-encoded sound tracks. Whether the movie is on videocassette,
laserdisc, from your cable system or over the air, chances are it is in
Dolby Stereo.
The New Theatrical Digital Formats
Today most movies for
commercial theater viewing are released
in one or more of the following digital formats: Dolby Digital, DTS, or
SDDS. These new digital sound systems are incompatible but share the
following characteristics: 1) they are pure digital; 2) they use
compression algorithms to fit multichannels either on the film (Dolby
Digital and SDDS), or on a separate CD (DTS); and 3) they have six
discrete channels, left front, center, right front, left surround, right
surround, and low frequency effect channel (LFE), referred to as 5.1
with the .1 for the LFE. (Note: SDDS provides 7.1 channels, with two
additional front channels. At this point, Sony, the developer of the
system have any plans to develop a consumer SDDS in the future. So, at
least at this point, we only have to deal with DD and DTS in the
following discussion.)
|
|
First, DD and DTS are incompatible systems.
If a movie theater wants to show both DD and DTS movies, it must have
two separate decoders. Similarly, if you want to use both DD and DTS
encoded software in your home, you must have the capability to decode
both.
What comes off any digital software is a digital bit
stream, a series of ones and zeros. It’s exactly what comes off your
stereo CDs, but there’s a difference between CDs and DD or DTS. A CD
has just two discrete channels and the bit stream contains all of the
music (i.e. no compression). But DD and DTS has six channels or three
times the information. And while CDs are typically one hour, movies are
typically two hours. So now, there’s twelve times the information.
Imagine the size of a CD that holds 12 times what a current CD
holds!
To get around the massive information storage problem,
engineers have developed perceptual coding algorithms which radically
reduce the size of the bit stream, but in such a way, that ideally
it sounds no different from a full bit stream. This is done by
"exploiting" commonly known properties of human hearing. Here
is a simple example: When you are listening to a symphony orchestra,
some instruments or sections of the orchestra are playing loudly, and
others softly. To your ears, the loud sections overcome the soft ones,
so you do not hear them. Hard to believe, but true. So the engineers at
DD and DTS use perceptual (what you perceive) coding which eliminates
the played, but unheard, sounds and thereby reduces the bit stream. (The
original term for DD, AC-3, is, in fact, the designation for DD’s
perceptual coding system)
A DD or DTS decoder takes
the bit stream, using the algorithm, divides it into 5.1 channels,
converts it into 5.1 or 6, analog channels and it’s ready to be played
by your six channel audio system. But here’s the problem. The
perceptual coding algorithms developed by DD and DTS are entirely
different. So if you want to listen to both formats, you need outboard
DD and DTS processors, or a preamp/processor or receiver which decodes
both. This was prohibitively expensive, but with the development of one
solution, IC chips that perform both DD and DTS, prices are coming down.
Whats Needed In Home Theaters
So which do you need in your home theater, DD, DTS, or
both? Honestly, this question is more easily asked then answered, but we
will review software that is and will become available in future CDs and
this may help with your decision.
Compact Discs:
There are a few CDs
recorded in DD. There are many more DTS CDs, but still fewer than 100.
Many more are planned. But, to confuse the situation, audio-only DVDs
will soon be released which will, of course, require new audio DVD
players, which may or may not incorporate the video DVD function. Further
complicating the matter is that two separate DVD audio only
discs will be released. One, released by Sony/Philips, has two layers-one compatible with CD players, and
another multichannel layer. The DVD consortium has another DVD audio disc which also be
multichannel, but not compatible with CD players. The two systems will
encode their bit streams in entirely different ways. Further, neither uses DD or DTS. The multichannel decoding will
be executed inside the player and output as 6 channels.
As you can see, the situation with CDs and DD/DTS encoding is messy and evolving as we speak.
|
|
LaserDiscs:
There are quite a few LDs in the DD format and an increasing
number in DTS. The point of confusion here is how the digital bit streams are
placed on the LDs.
In the days of old, the audio track of LDs was an
analog signal similar to an FM radio signal, with or without CX noise reduction.
With the advent of CDs, LDs were released with the Dolby Surround (analog in
theaters) track placed on the LD as a CD PCM (pulse Code Modulation) system. The
old analog tracks were used for the directors commentaries and the like.
With the advent of digital movie theater sound, DD
and DTS proposed two different systems of encoding the digital soundtrack. DTS
proposed replacing the PCM digital signal with a DTS signal which would require
little compression. DD proposed replacing the left analog signal with it’s bit
stream modulated as an FM carrier in order to preserve the PCM/Dolby surround
signal for those without DD decoders. And that’s how they’re released today.
For DTS LDs, you just go from the digital output of the laserdisc player into
the digital input of the DTS processor or receiver. For DD LS, you must first
pass the signal through an RF demodulator which strips the FM carrier off the
digital bit stream. The output of the demodulator is then input into the
digital input of the DD processor or receiver. But this discussion may be
academic. With the release of DVDs, sales of LD software have plummeted. For
anyone starting out new, an LD is not recommended. Buy a DVD player. But
thousands have LD players and LD collections. Unless they plan on replacing
their LDs with DVDs as they come out (and many old movies may not be released on
DVD for years), this discussion is still relevant.
Digital Video Discs:
The DVD standard requires that all DVD releases have a PCM
track or a DD track. It’s a practical matter, all but a handful have been
released with DD. Great, you think. All movies are 5.1 channels on DVD because
they’re DD. Unfortunately, no. While all DD theatrical releases and nearly all
DD and LDs are 5.1 channels, not all DD DVDs are. Here’s why. For DVDs, DD
only refers to the perceptual coding used. DD DVDs can be mono, stereo, 4
channel (dolby surround), 5.0 channel )No LFE) or 5.1 channel (!). The reason
for this is simple. DD DVDs can only encode and play the original sound track.
Since nearly all pre star wars movies were mono, the DD DVD will also be DD
mono. Operas and concerts recorded in Stereo will be in DD stereo. Dolby
Surround movies will be 4 channel. And digital 5.1 movies will be 5.1. (Here
another confusing thing-DTS theatrical releases are released as DD DVDs). The
only exception to this is where studios have remixed the Dolby Surround movies
to be 5.1 releases.
DTS has announced that it will be releasing DTS
encoded DVDs. These DVDs have a DTS "flag" on the DVD which the DVD
must be able to read. Unfortunately, no first generation, and only a few second
generation DVD players can read the DTS flag. However, the cost to the
manufacturer of making a DVD player DTS compatible is minimal. If DTS
establishes a foot hold in the DVD market, all players will be DTS compatible.
Because all DVDs must contain a DD track, all DTS DVDs will contain a DTS track.
But here’s the trick. Remember, for DVD, DD does not equal automatic 5.1. So a
DTS DVD may have a 5.1 DTS track, but only a 2 channel DD track, most likely
matrixed analog Dolby Surround. But few decoders on sensing a stereo digital
signal will automatically switch to Dolby Pro Logic (the home analog Dolby
surround), and most cannot be forced into that mode, so you’ll just have a
stereo signal. Steven Spielberg is a part owner of DTS, and rumor has it that he
will only allow his movies to be released in 5.1 DTs, not 5.1 DD. So, for DVD,
DD vs. DTS may not be merely a choice of which 5.1 format you prefer with
duplicate releases.
|
|
DTS vs. DD - Is There A Real Difference Sonically?
Honestly, this is a fight we are reluctant to take sides
on, there simply are a lot of good arguments illustrating the claims of
both systems. We urge you to do some reading, and listening, and form
your own conclusions! However, as you collect information, here are some
of the issues you will find. The DTS system uses significantly less
compression, and it’s proponents claim it sounds closer to the
original sound tracks. Dolby responds that it’s DD system in A/B
comparisons is indistinguishable from the master tapes, so who cares
about compression amount. DTS also claims it has a more robust bass and
distinct surround channels. DD responds that DTS artificially boosts
those channels(!) so that is why some listeners form those conclusions.
If you are thinking of doing your own comparison, keep this in mind.
Rarely, even on the same movie released in DD and DTS consumer versions,
is the same film "mix" used, so A/B tests of the same release
will often sound different. Finally, three of the leading consumer home
theater magazines performed rigorous, blind A/B comparisons using DTS/DD
LDs with the exact same mix. The result ? One said there was no
detectable difference; the second said there were "some"
differences and the third said DTS sounded better than DD. Warning: your
results may differ! |
|
Digital Television:
At least for DTV, the situation is simple. DD is the
mandatory standard, with no alternatives. Thank God, this one is simple,
at least for now. |
|
Understanding Home THX
The THX Story...
In the late 1970s,
blockbusters such as STAR WARS and others drew the public’s attention
to the potential of high quality sound in the cinema sound. However,
George Lucas suspected that all the attention that he and other
filmmakers put into the sound tracks of their movies was being sabotaged
by inferior sound systems in theaters around the world. So Lucas hired a
young engineer by the name of Tomlinson Holman to look into the matter
and dubbed the project THX, for "Tom Holman’s Experiment,"
and, not so coincidently, the name of Lucas’s first commercial film: THX
1138.
The results? Holman’s
theater survey confirmed their worst fears: The sound systems in
theaters around this country and the rest of the world ranged from
acceptable to down right terrible. Upon receipt of this conclusion,
Lucas immediately set Holman to the task of writing a set of standards
for the entire movie sound "chain" that would help.
In specific, he wanted
theaters to reproduce the audio quality achieved on the finest
Hollywood dubbing stages. (Note: The dubbing stage is a highly
specialized, theater-sized sound track mixing environment. The various
sound elements of a film, such as dialogue, sound effects, music scores,
etc., are mixed by skilled sound engineers in this special studio. The
dubbing stage is the reference standard for a film’s audio tracks.)
Thus began the highly
successful Lucasfilm Ltd. THX® program. Today, the THX name has become
synonymous with the highest level of theater sound system reproduction.
Arguably the most important theater in the world, the 1000 seat Samuel
Goldwyn Theater of the Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (it is here that
Academy Award nomination screenings are held), is a THX theater.
Currently, there are over 950 theaters and dubbing stages around the
world that have been designed or re-engineered for THX
reproduction.
After the massive success of
the commercial THX business, the next step, naturally, was to design a
system that would reproduce the dubbing stage experience in the home. In
order to achieve this, Holman identified six goals that all "Home
THX" systems must achieve:
1) Accurate frequency
response.
Dubbing stages are equalized with
the industry standard "X" curve. This standard is defined by
the International Standards Organization (ISO) in their specification
ISO 2969-1977 and is designed to compensate for the acoustics of large
movie theaters. Lucasfilm realized that this equalization does not apply
to a home system, so a proprietary "Reequalization circuit" is
specified for home use. The diagram approximates the Home THX
re-equalization curves.
|
|
|
2) Intelligible dialogue.
With rare exception, every word spoken in a movie is
intended to be heard clearly by the audience. THX systems assure that
this is the case by specifying a center channel speaker with a
narrow vertical dispersion pattern and driven by an electronic processor
utilizing a Lucasfilm THX® proprietary dialogue equalization
circuit.
3) Full dynamic range.
Filmmakers spend a great deal of time adjusting the
components of their sound tracks to play at specific levels (see the
diagram at the right). THX specifications require that a Home THX system
be calibrated so that the standard 70 dB THX reference tone is played
back at exactly 70 dB Sound Pressure Level (SPL.)
4) Accurate on-screen
localization.
The location of the sound field coming from an on-screen
image, such as a glass breaking, should appear in the same place as the
visual image. In order to localize on-screen sources, Lucasfilm
specifies that front speakers also be designed with narrow vertical
dispersion patterns, and be precisely located in reference to the
screen.
5) Smooth panning.
This requires a set of well matched speakers, properly
placed for minimum room reflections. Speakers that are mismatched and
misplaced, can cause a panned or moving sound source (like a actor’s
dialogue) to jump about or change in tone. This can ruin the effect
desired by the director.
6) An enveloping
sound field.
The sound coming from the surround speakers is for
"diffuse ambiance". It shouldn't be "localized" (the
source of the sound located), and THX systems use a special
decorrelation circuit and dipole speaker radiation pattern to assure
that this is the case.
How To Get THX Sound In a Home Theater
For you to achieve what the Lucasfilm creative forces have
designed, the cinema dubbing stage experience in your own home, several
items are required:
A Home THX controller.
This proprietary circuitry is licensed from Lucasfilm and is built into
many A/V receivers and stand alone processors. The diagram above
illustrates the signal processing that a THX licensed unit performs. THX
licensed A/V receivers and processors are available from a number of
manufacturers. With the advent of DD and DTS, there are now two
THX standards for a controller, THX 4.0 and THX 5.1. THX 4.0 is used for
analog Dolby Surround and THX 5.1 is used for DD and DTS. Most THX
standards (subwoofer crossover, reequalization) are the same. But in 5.1
the decorrelation circuits for the surrounds shuts off when the surround
channels are carrying discrete information, and kicks back in when the
surround channel information is the same for the l and R surround,
maintaining a diffuse sound field.
A Home THX speaker
system.
The loudspeaker requirements of the home THX system are tightly
specified and include requirements for loudspeaker distortion,
directional properties, frequency response, sensitivity, impedance and
power handling. For example:
Front Speakers: The three front speakers (left, center and right)
must be identically matched, with a flat response over 80hz to 20kHz.
They also should have identically focused dispersion patterns and be
magnetically shielded to prevent distortion in nearby televisions.
Surround Speakers: Home THX systems are required to utilize two dipole
design surround speakers to prevent localization of the surround
information. See the diagram above.
Subwoofers: THX systems are
required to have at least one subwoofer to reproduce the bass range
(20hz to 80Hz) of the three front channels. The crossover of the
subwoofer and the front speakers must be electronically matched with 24
dB/octave slopes. THX subwoofers must be able of sustaining a 105 dB SPL,
in a 3000 cubic foot room, in the farthest seating position. Note: as
the diagram below illustrates, for best sub-woofer performance, place
the subwoofers in the corner of the room.
|
|
Home THX amplifiers.
Home THX amplifiers must pass minimum electrical specifications and be
capable of producing a constant sound pressure level without overload.
For example, THX amplifiers must provide at least 100 watts in order to
drive the speakers to the upper limits of a film’s sound tracks (105
dB). Furthermore, at all levels of amplification, the THX amplifiers
must not produce audible distortion. Further, they must be able to
deliver their rated power into a 3.2 Ohm load, all channels driven, on a
continuos basis.
Home THX Receivers.
THX also certifies receivers for home use, both with Dolby Surround and
Dolby Digital. No doubt, DTS/DD/THX receivers are in the offing.
Receivers must have THX controller circuitry (crossover, reequalization,
timbre matching, decorrelation). THX receivers also have stringent
receiver power amplifier requirements which far exceed the typical
receiver. They are, however, as stringent as the requirements for
separate power amplifiers (e.g. no 3.2 Ohm power requirement). |
|
Home Theater Speaker Systems
In a home theater, speakers need to be placed in specific
locations. Frequency response and audio localization are greatly affected by
where you place them. There is a great deal of academic research documenting
this, so consider it a truth. Location, location, location is not just an old
saw for real estate professionals.
Let’s consider the front speakers first. Ideally, it is best to
have left, center, and right speakers of the same type and aligned in a
horizontal line through the middle of the video image. Unfortunately, this is
not possible in most home theaters because the front speakers need to go right
smack through the middle of the picture. The next best position is to flank the
television, or video screen, with the left and right speakers, and install the
center channel either above or below the picture. (Note: for those that are
building high-end home theaters with front projectors, several screen
manufacturers offer perforated acoustically transparent screens so that speakers
can actually be placed directly behind the screen. However the center speaker
must match the voice characteristics of the l&R speakers, typically by using
the same tweeter and midrange.)
There are several schools of thought about the type and placement
of surround speakers, but the most popular is to place the speakers so they are
flanking the audience seating area, and somewhat above the listener's ear level.
In the days of analog Dolby Surround, there was a general consensus that di-polar
(multi-driver, wired out-of phase) were best for creating a diffuse sound field.
In fact, that was, and is, a THX requirement. With the advent of DD and
DTS, with discrete L&R surround channels, many began to advocate front
radiating point source speakers and surrounds. The problem with this approach is
that when mounting as shown in the diagram, the speakers, though excellent at
directional special effects, did not do well at creating a diffuse surround
sound field, and were identifiable as point sources. Several A/B tests by home
theater experts confirmed this. They found that di-polar speakers did a more
than adequate job at localized, directional sound effects while otherwise
maintaining a diffuse sound field, even with stereo music in the surround
channels. THX still recommends dipolar speakers in THX 5.1. The only possible
exception would be in a large room where direct radiating fronts could be placed
substantially behind the listening position (at least 1/2 the front seating
distance.) Finally, one or two subwoofers are a must with today's home theater
systems. The LFE (low frequency effects) .1 channel of DD and DTS are simply
beyond the capabilities of most woofers in full range front speakers. Even Dolby
Surround has bass-laden sound tracks which demand a separate subwoofer. Further,
the use of subwoofer(s) can [permit you to buy smaller L&R speakers saving
money and enhancing ease of placement.
To finish our thoughts about placement, let’s take a look at some
common home theater speaker configurations.
|
|
|
In
Home
Theater Room Number One.
In this case we have mounted the dipolar surround channels up on a beam that
traverses the room and added a second subwoofer. Alternatively, two speakers
matching the fronts can be placed on stands behind the couch.
Home
Theater Room Number Two
shows a picture tube type television mounted in
an A/V furniture cabinet. The center channel speaker is placed on top of the
television and the left and right front speakers flank it on shelves. A
subwoofer is placed below the television. This may be less optimum for bass
reinforcement, but it conceals the subwoofer enclosure and makes the system less
intrusive. In this particular room, placing dipole speakers on the walls was not
an option because of the window locations, so circular surround speakers were
placed in the ceiling. The last illustration,
Home Theater Room Number Three,
we show high-end home theater with a
large, front projected video image. Here we have used in-wall speakers around
the screen to give the room a clean, theater-like look. There are many
manufacturers that make in-wall speakers specifically for home theater
applications. We recommend you look at some of the enthusiasts magazines for
specific brands.
The rear surround channels are also in-wall speakers.
Because this is a high end enthusiast’s home theater room, we put two
subwoofers in the front corners for full low frequency capability. Another
option is to built the subwoofer’s into the walls or into the floor, if you
want to hide them.
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Copyright |
Privacy Policy |
Contact
|
|